|
Electron microscopy examinations of Ultra Bond 2000TM were performed by the Center for Dirt & Gravel Road Studies at Penn State University. |
|||
| The results have shown that Ultra Bond 2000TM coats the aggregate surfaces, forming "bridges" between the grains. This develops strength in the cured composite material. | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA State Forestry and D & G Road Studies will continue to monitor the effectiveness of JMG Enterprises dust suppressant on a stretch of road in Union County. Below are the results of a "sweep sample" performed on two 1' square sections. The jars in between the samples are from the buffer sections where no product was applied. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
In commemoration of the 2000 Governor’s Award for Environmental Excellence presented to the Task Force on Dirt & Gravel Roads, JMG Enterprises, Inc is recognized for it’s important contribution at the December 2000 ceremony held in the Commonwealth’s capitol. |
![]() |
||
![]() |
|||
|
Field
Observations of Resin Based Dust Suppressants A report
to: JMG
Enterprises, Inc. August,
2001 Background
Members from the Center for Dirt and Gravel Road Studies have
recently visited three sites where JMG has used resin based dust
suppressants and/or stabilization agents.
The observations below are of New Millport Road, Knox Township,
Clearfield County, T433. New Millport Road
New Millport Road is located in Knox Township, Clearfield
County. New Millport Road
was reclaimed in the fall of 1999 (8/31/99).
Historically, the section of road being treated had suffered
from rutting due to poor drainage and damage from ATV activities.
Just prior to the reclamation, a partially successful road
maintenance project had been carried out along the same strength of
road. The road was again rapidly deteriorating as the result of the
use of an overly coarse material as the road surface. For this project a layer of finer aggregate was brought
in and blended into the road surface to a depth of 5-6”using a
reclaimer. After
reclaiming, two applications of the dust palliative at the rate of ½
gal./sq. yd were applied. The
road was then graded and rolled.
A final topcoat of ¼ gal./sq. yd. was then applied.
Except as noted below there as been little maintenance
performed on the road since the reclamation.
The road was evaluated on July 3, 2001.
Figure 6 (a-e) shows photographs of typical sections of the
road taken during this inspection.
Large sections of the road were still in very good shape, even
after 2 ½ years with little or no maintenance.
Little dust was observed from passing vehicles even though it
was a hot dry day. Figure
7 (a-c) show a road surface that is still tightly bonded and the road
surface is still in excellent shape 2 ½ years after reclaiming.
Even when large pieces of aggregate 4-6” in diameter, the
surface has apparently remained knitted into a cohesive, well-bonded
structure. Loose material on the surface of the road is apparently
anti-skid remaining from winter operations.
The potholes are developing in areas where there was not an
adequate crown in the road or in other areas of poor drainage, Figure
8 (a-c). In particular,
areas near driveways or other features that discharge water onto the
road seems to be particularly badly degraded.
In summary, even after ~2 ½ years with little or no maintenance New Millport Road is still quite serviceable. The majority of the loose material observed on the road is apparently anti-skid from winter operations. The road is deteriorating in areas that suffer from poor drainage. The worst areas seem to be occurring in sections where water is being discharged directly onto the road surface from driveways, etc. One can only speculate as to what shape the road might be in if the manufacturer recommendations for annual maintenance were followed.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e)
Figure 6 (a-e) – Views of New Millport road taken on July 3, 2001. |
|||
|
(a)
(b)
(c) Figure 7 (a-c) – Close-ups of the surface
of New Millport road taken on July 3, 2001.
(a)
(b)
(c) Figure 8 (a - c) are areas that have been patched using cold patch.
|
|||